1
Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error: "In management, as you rise higher, the problems you face become more and more unstructured and you can't just fall back on the tools you had been."
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze the given sentence part: "the problems you face becomemore and more unstructured and you can't just fall back on".
Step 2: Identify the first clear error: "becomemore" is a typographical or spacing error; it should be written as "become more".
Step 3: Consider the phrasing "the problems you face". While grammatically sound for plural subjects, the provided solution suggests a refinement to "the problem you face", shifting to a singular focus on the 'type' of problem.
Step 4: Examine the phrasal verb "fall back on". While common, "fall back upon" is often considered more formal and appropriate in academic or professional contexts like 'management'.
Step 5: Additionally, the nuance conveyed by "you can't just fall back on" is refined in the solution to "you can't afford to fall back upon". This strengthens the implication of consequence or necessity, suggesting a more impactful inability rather than a casual one.
Step 6: Combining these corrections (typo, noun number adjustment, phrasal verb choice, and enhanced phrasing), the problematic part is meant to be rephrased to achieve greater formality and precision.
Step 7: Therefore, the error is in the part "the problems you face becomemore and more unstructured and you can't just fall back on".
2
Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error: "If you work hard, you will get good grades in examinations."
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze the given sentence: "If you work hard, you will get good grades in examinations."
Step 2: Focus on the phrase "in examinations."
Step 3: When referring to a general system or a specific instance of a test where one receives grades, the definite article 'the' is typically used before 'examination' in its singular form, or 'the' before a plural if referring to a specific set (e.g., 'the final examinations').
Step 4: Without an article, "in examinations" implies a very broad, undefined context, whereas in the examination refers to a more specific, understood academic event or system. The solution suggests a singular definite article.
Step 5: Therefore, the more natural and grammatically precise phrasing in this context would be "in the examination" or "in examinations" if referring to multiple types of exams, but the lack of 'the' with the plural 'examinations' for general grade acquisition makes it less idiomatic.
Step 6: The error is in the phrase "in examinations." as it requires a definite article 'the' for specific context or different phrasing.
8
Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error: "Since it was his first election campaign, the candidate was confused; none could clearly understand either the principles he stood for or the benefits he promised."
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze each part of the sentence for grammatical errors, consistency, and proper usage.
Step 2: Examine the first part: "Since it was his first election campaign, the candidate was confused;". 'Since' correctly introduces a reason, 'was' is in the correct past tense, and the semicolon properly joins two closely related independent clauses.
Step 3: Examine the second part: "none could clearly understand". 'None' (meaning no one) is used correctly, 'could understand' is the correct past modal verb phrase, and 'clearly' is an appropriate adverb.
Step 4: Examine the third part: "either the principles he stood for or the benefits he promised.". The correlative conjunction "either... or" is used correctly to present two parallel options. "the principles he stood for" and "the benefits he promised" maintain parallel structure.
Step 5: The entire sentence is grammatically sound, logically coherent, and well-constructed.
Step 6: Therefore, there is no error in the sentence.
9
Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error: "I had hoped to have met him yesterday to discuss the matter with him but he was not in his house, and so I could not meet him."
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze the given sentence: "I had hoped to have met him yesterday to discuss the matter with him but he was not in his house, and so I could not meet him."
Step 2: Focus on the phrase "I had hoped to have met him yesterday".
Step 3: The main verb "had hoped" is in the past perfect tense, indicating a hope that existed before another past event. The infinitive here refers to the content of that past hope.
Step 4: A perfect infinitive (to have + past participle, e.g., "to have met") implies an action that would have been completed *before* the time of the main verb. However, when verbs like 'hope', 'expect', 'intend' are in a past tense (especially past perfect) and express an unfulfilled intention or desire for a past action, a simple infinitive (to + base verb) is typically used.
Step 5: "I had hoped to meet him" correctly conveys that the hope existed in the past for a meeting in the past (yesterday), but the meeting did not happen. The perfect infinitive "to have met" creates redundancy and is incorrect for this context.
Step 6: Correct "I had hoped to have met him yesterday" to "I had hoped to meet him yesterday".
Step 7: Therefore, the error is in the part "I had hoped to have met him yesterday".
10
Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error: "His father died of cholera but his mother also, though very weak, is out of danger."
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze the given sentence: "His father died of cholera but his mother also, though very weak, is out of danger."
Step 2: Focus on the phrase "but his mother also,".
Step 3: The conjunction "but" already introduces a contrasting or additional piece of information, implying a shift to another related element (his mother's condition).
Step 4: The word "also" in this specific context is redundant. The fact that his mother is being mentioned in contrast or as an additional subject is already conveyed by the structure of the sentence following "but". Including "also" makes the phrase unnecessarily wordy without adding essential meaning.
Step 5: Removing "also" makes the sentence more concise and grammatically sound without altering its intended meaning.
Step 6: Correct "but his mother also," to "but his mother,".
Step 7: Therefore, the error is in the part "but his mother also,".
11
Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error: "You will come to my party tomorrow, isn't it?"
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze the given sentence: "You will come to my party tomorrow, isn't it?"
Step 2: Identify the sentence as a statement followed by a question tag.
Step 3: Recall the rules for forming question tags:
* If the main statement is positive, the tag is negative.
* The tag uses the auxiliary verb from the main statement.
* The tag uses the pronoun corresponding to the subject of the main statement.
Step 4: In the main statement "You will come...", the auxiliary verb is "will", and the subject is "You".
Step 5: Therefore, the correct negative question tag should be formed using 'will' and 'you', which is "won't you?" (will + not = won't).
Step 6: The tag "isn't it?" is incorrect because it uses the auxiliary verb "is" and the pronoun "it", which do not match the main statement's auxiliary verb or subject.
Step 7: Correct "isn't it?" to "won't you?".
Step 8: Therefore, the error is in the part "isn't it?".
14
Identify the part of the sentence that contains a grammatical error: "If I were him, I would have taught those cheats a lesson."
0:00
Solution: Step 1: Analyze the given sentence: "If I were him, I would have taught those cheats a lesson."
Step 2: Recognize that this is a hypothetical conditional statement using the subjunctive mood, indicated by "If I were...".
Step 3: Recall the rule that pronouns following the verb 'to be' (especially in the subjunctive mood) should be in the nominative case (subjective case), not the objective case, as 'to be' acts as a linking verb.
Step 4: In the clause "If I were him,", 'him' is an objective pronoun. It should be in the nominative case to match the implied subject complement.
Step 5: Correct 'him' to 'he'.
Step 6: The correct phrase should be: "If I were he,".
Step 7: Therefore, the error is in the part "If I were him,".